While there are intergovernmental agreements on the reciprocity of learning licences, these agreements can be confusing for those trying to transfer their apprenticeship licence or certificate from one state to another. Simply put, while states may have agreements with other countries that the education or test requirements are equivalent between the two, a state can (and often does) impose its own national requirements under the Intergovernmental Reciprocity Agreement. NASDTEC is not the only organization with intergovernmental agreements. Many states have committed to regional agreements with neighbouring countries. Regional agreements are smaller and therefore allow for greater specificity and agreement between different aspects of licensing and reciprocity. In the case of a smaller number of states, there is also the potential to define a uniform standard for licensing and preparation. States can be both members of the NASDTEC Interstate Agreement and a regional agreement, and you can apply for a job in that state or the other, depending on your qualification, in accordance with either agreement. The SHEEO report contains some of the specific regional agreements that have been concluded to compensate all teachers who have been omitted by the terms of the NASDTEC agreement. Without careful consideration, it is not certain that other professions face many of the same bureaucratic snafus that appear to be teachers when alternating between states. In addition, there is no tangible evidence that reciprocity rules in other occupations have succeeded in improving mobility measures in the United States.
If you use the responsiveness of teacher certification to obtain certification from the teacher in a new state, you do not fall into your original state. Instead, you now have two teacher certifications for two states. If you are likely to return to the state in which you first acquired your teacher certification, be sure to keep it informed. For your certification to take place in a state, you must request reciprocity if you ever return to that state. Since confirmation relapse is not a two-way system, you may not be able to simply bring your certification back to its original state. Learn more in the following two sections on how reciprocity is not a two-way agreement. Most countries recognize national certification as a quality performance and automatically certify non-governmental teachers who have obtained this certification. This can be a great advantage for teachers who move often.
These heavy requirements seem relatively unique for teaching. The difficulty of transferring teacher certification is not limited to New York – as Franz learned when she later moved to California and had to move through the process of that state. Some states, including New York, have recently made shifts to facilitate the process. As the 74 reported last year, Kirsten Rogers had 12 years of teaching experience in Utah, but when she moved to Minnesota, she only got a two-year temporary license. To obtain a full registration certificate, she would have to take additional courses and pay. Their story was not a runaway, and she and other teachers filed a complaint against the state. But to get this job, she had to be certified and certified in New York – she was already certified in Pennsylvania. But first it had to decipher the requirements imposed on it and then pass an expensive battery of tests. The Pennsylvania certification test she had passed was not new York`s. Surveys of teachers also seem to confirm that the barriers are real. About 41 percent of former teachers who would consider returning to the profession reported “the state certification relapse” as very or extremely important in their analysis, according to an analysis of federal data by the Learning Policy Institute.
Comments are closed.