First, because each word can have several meanings at once. Let`s take a very simple example: Conclusion: translation can, yes, help a lot when it comes to understanding English, especially at the beginning. But don`t count on her forever. Avoid translating everything so as not to end up with literal and insignificant sentences, but learn to really understand English, 😉 I think this article gives a good proposition “don`t want to translate everything” and that “we should think in English to speak better English”, but I didn`t have as information what English can do live to make us think in English! What methods or tools should we use to literally think in English, instead of just translating or understanding what movies are talking about, books, academic articles, etc.? Very good contribution, really I will always fish a few words in the dictionary and if I try to match the sentence, it is not an unimportant one. I have a lot of words and phrases in Portuguese that can`t be translated into English, right? Leave in the comments some you like to have in English! And when it comes to Ghosts, it`s worse. There is no automatic translator or word for word in the dictionary that gives you the meaning of certain expressions. The advice is not free. Although translation helps to understand the general context (after all, no one is born with a foreign language), there is not always all the information and nuances of a sentence. If you translated word for word, in the simplest sense of the word, you would say, “I see your point.” But that expression in Portuguese would be “I understand what you mean.” So the job of (good) professional translators and interpreters is to adapt, and never literally! There is a lot of work to adapt the context in English (or other foreign language) to ours, in order to bring the audience closer to the work while retaining the essence of the original message. Speaking of films, we know that the “translation” of certain series and film titles is questionable because they deal more with a salesman name for marketing than with English meaning. Do you want to see him? Did you know that the famous “waiting for a miracle” in the original The Green Mile is the reference to the prison`s death row, the film`s main setting? Sister Act, here known as “Change of Clothes,” got a second meaning with the pun on “habit,” religious clothing.

Recent changes to the TUPE regulations for transfers on 31.01.14 or after 31.01.14 do not require the new organization to comply with these collective agreements, i.e. wage increases. The collective agreements of workers transferred before that date are protected. All union recognition is transferred to the new employer. The union will obtain the approval of the new employer to continue the recognition. Collective agreements in force at the time of the transfer are also transferred to the new employer. These include terms of employment negotiated through collective bargaining and broader labour relations. For example, the collective dispute procedure, school leave, training of union representatives, negotiated redundancy procedures or workplace safety regimes and flexible work regimes. The outgoing employer is required to provide the arriving employer with written information about the transferred workers, including identity, age, employment data, disciplinary and complaint documents, workers` rights and collective agreements, as well as all related rights and commitments that are transferred.

This information should not be provided less than 28 days before the transfer, although the new employer will in practice endeavour to obtain this information much earlier. Tariff conditions can be renegotiated after one year, provided that the overall contract is no less favourable to the employee. What will happen to the collective agreements that I currently enjoy? If the employer of a worker concerned intends to take action on the worker concerned, he must consult with the worker`s representatives in order to reach an agreement with the worker concerned on the measures envisaged. In certain circumstances, contractual changes made by the new collective agreements agreed by the outgoing employer are not necessary as a result of a transfer. If an independent union has been recognized by the outgoing employer for the transfer of workers, recognition is also passed on to the incoming employer. Since 2014, tariff conditions can be renegotiated after one year, provided that they are generally no less favourable to the employee. DUPE regulations preserve the terms and conditions of employees when a company or part of it is transferred to a new employer. Any provision of an agreement (whether an employment contract or not) is not applicable to the extent that it would exclude or limit the rights granted by the regulations.

The diagrams below contain a list of current agreements based on the underlying source of authority, if any, for each OF the CANAPES. In each category, agreements are categorized by partner country in alphabetical order. The categories are defined as follows: in 1951, before Germany became a member of NATO, the United States and Germany reached an agreement67 on the assurances required by the 1951 Mutual Security Act.68 Germany joined NATO in 1955 and in the same year concluded a mutual defence assistance agreement,69 which requires the United States to “provide such equipment, materials, services or other, 70 1971: Agreement on the deployment of the United States Middle East Force to Bahrain (22 U.S.T. 2184) – amended by the 1975 agreement for the use of the United States Middle East Force in Bahrain (26 U.S.T. 3027) and 1977 Personnel Management Unit Status Agreement (28 U.S.T. 5312) 1991 : Agreement on the Deployment of the U.S. Armed Forces (T.I.A.P. 12236) In a press release on the November 26, 2007 statement, General Douglas Lute stated, Presidential Assistant for Iraq and Afghanistan, that the government does not foresee a forward-looking agreement with Iraq that “has the status of a formal treaty that would then lead to formal negotiations or formal contributions from Congress.” Office of White House Spokesman, Press Gaggle of Dana Perino and General Douglas Lute, Presidential Assistant for Iraq and Afghanistan, November 26, 2007, available from georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2007/11/20071126-6.html. The United States has CONCLUDEd SOFAs whose authority underpinning the agreement is a treaty ratified by the U.S. Senate. In 1960132, the United States included with Japan a SOFA under the entry into force of the Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security133, which was previously concluded between the countries. In addition, in 1967134, the United States included with Korea a SOFA under the authority of Article V of the previous mutual defence treaty between the two countries.135, that nothing in the agreement diminishes, abridges, or alters the right of the United States to ensure its own security by excluding or removing persons whose presence in the United States is considered to be detrimental to their security or security, and that no person whose presence in the United States is considered detrimental to their security is permitted to travel to the United States or temporarily stay in Belize for their stay.

, training, humanitarian aid or any other activity that may be agreed by the two T.I.A.S. governments, military exchange agreements and visits between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Mongolia, agreement of 26 June 1996.

In the statement of the Potsdam conference on Germany, it is stated: “The intention of the Allies is to enable the German people to prepare for a possible reconstruction of their lives on a democratic and peaceful basis.” The four areas of occupation of Germany, designed at the Yalta conference, were created, each to be managed by the commander-in-chief of the Soviet, British, American or French occupation army. Berlin, Vienna and Austria were also divided into four zones of occupation. An allied supervisory board, made up of representatives of the four allies, should deal with issues relating to Germany and Austria as a whole. Their policy was dictated by the “five Ds” decided in Yalta: demilitarization, denatalization, democratization, decentralization and deindustrialization. Each Allied power had to seize repairs to its own areas of occupation, while the Soviet Union was allowed 10 to 15 percent of industrial equipment in western Germany in exchange for agricultural and other natural products in its area. The main objective of the Potsdam conference was to put an end to the post-war period and to put into practice all that had been agreed in Yalta. While the Yalta meeting was rather friendly, the Potsdam conference was marked by differences of opinion that were the result of some important changes since the Yalta conference. The Potsdam conference took place in Potsdam from 17 July to 2 August 1945. (In some older documents, it is also called the Berlin Conference of the three heads of government of the USSR, the United States and the United Kingdom. [2] [3] Participants were the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom and the United States, represented by Prime Minister Joseph Stalin, Prime Minister Winston Churchill[4] and Clement Attlee[5] and President Harry S. Truman.

They met to decide how to manage Germany, which nine weeks earlier, on 8 May (Victory Day in Europe), had declared itself ready to surrender unconditionally. Among the objectives of the conference were the establishment of the post-war order, the issues of the peace treaty and the fight against the effects of war. Truman was much more suspicious of the Soviets than Roosevelt and increasingly suspicious of Stalin`s intentions. [11] Truman and his advisers regarded Soviet action in Eastern Europe as aggressive expansionism, incompatible with the agreements Stalin had been obliged to in Yalta in February. In addition, Truman discovered possible complications elsewhere when Stalin rejected Stalin Churchill`s proposal to withdraw the Allies from Iran before the timetable agreed at the Tehran conference. The Potsdam conference was the only time Truman met Stalin himself. [13] [14] The three governments have taken note of the talks that have taken place in recent weeks in London between representatives of the United Kingdom, the United States, the Soviet Union and France to reach agreement on the methods of trial of major war criminals whose crimes do not present a particular geographical location after the Moscow Declaration of October 1943.